|
EPA Listening Session
December
12, 2006, 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM
Oral Statement
from Sister Sharon Dillon, ED of the Franciscan Federation
My name is Sister Sharon Dillon, and I am the Executive Director
of the Franciscan Federation of the United States, with over
100,000 associate members. This summer, our faith network,
representing over 10,000 Franciscans in the United States,
adopted a resolution to work to protect the waters entrusted to
us, and to act to ensure that governments meet the
responsibility of providing access to clean and safe water,
something we view as a free gift from God.
In light of the water crisis facing our world today, we are
eager to collaborate with agencies and organizations that pursue
both increasing access to water and maintenance and improvement
of the public infrastructure that provides this fundamental
need. Water is a sacred gift and, as Franciscans, we address
Water as our Sister. Therefore, we want to thank the EPA and all
the participants for holding this listening session on the best
ways to provide water in contaminated small [or any] systems. In
answering this question, we believe it is vital to consider the
equities as well as the efficiencies of this issue and in doing
so we believe that there are lessons to be applied from the way
our nation has shared the abundance of its resources in the
past.
From our nation’s earliest days, our policies recognized that
prosperity depends upon the universal availability of effective
and affordable public utilities. Indeed, the postal service
subsidized service to small towns and remote areas by ensuring
that letters destined for far-flung locations traveled for the
same price, whether from Washington to Philadelphia or
Washington to the Oregon frontier. During the first few decades
of the twentieth century, government subsidies helped bring
rural communities into the nation’s phone system at a price
affordable to community residents. And during the New Deal, the
Tennessee Valley Authority was created to extend electrical
service to people in the rural South. The TVA was not cheap, and
some might have argued that it would be more efficient to simply
deliver free candles to those in the region, but doing so would
have left a considerable number of our fellow Americans quite
literally in the dark, ensuring the continued marginalization of
some of the poorest regions of the United States.
In comparison, our government ought not accept schools,
factories, hospitals and other such places to be divided between
those who have continued access to safe, clean water and those
which are limited to bottled water. Not only is this unjust but
inhumane. How much water each student, employee or patient
should receive becomes a cost-driven assessment.
Our
government’s commitment to sharing the fruits of prosperity
helped build a strong economy, healthy communities, and national
prosperity unparalleled throughout human history. This was
possible only by treating affordable communication and access to
safe and reliable electricity as rights of citizenship. As our
nation moves into the twenty-first century, access to safe,
clean, affordable water should be regarded in the same way.
More-over unlike mail, telephones, and electrical power, access
to water is essential to human life. We view it as a free gift
from God. We must view water not only as a right conferred by
society, but as a basic human right, a gift given for our very
life sustainability.
Applying
principles of subsidiary, the rights to water must be met by the
level of government closest to the problem—but only to the
extent that localities possess the resources to confront the
issue on their own. Because local towns and state governments
couldn’t meet their own electricity demands, the federal
government had to intervene with funding and technical
assistance to assure that residents of the Tennessee Valley had
access to electricity in the same manner that others did
throughout the country. The national government may in the same
manner bear responsibility for assuring that those with
contaminated local water systems have access to clean water from
their taps, a right that the vast majority of Americans take for
granted. Delivering bottled water and requiring some individuals
to go through the inconvenience and hassle of hauling and
storing water, and having to use contaminated water for bathing,
laundry and other hygienic needs violates the essential
tradition of equity that has clearly been established in the
provision of communication and electricity resources. It is
disrespectful of the dignity of the human person. There are no
doubt a number treatment options, based in part on the
particular needs of each community - it is the job of the
government or organization in question to figure out which is
most appropriate in order to deliver safe and convenient water
to those affected by arsenic in their small town systems. Safe
and clean water is not optional, it is vital.
Like the ease of communication and access to electricity, easy
access to safe water is a component of our national social
fabric. Water is a more vital part of our shared heritage than
the postal system or the electricity grid. We believe that it is
vital that the water policies of the EPA acknowledge and affirm
water as a human right, (a God given gift) and establish
policies that protect all Americans’ right to safe and
convenient water, taking into account both efficiency and
equity. Water is our Sister, and that relationship is as
relevant as a “sister” in my familial relationship.
We are only one of many faith communities concerned about
access to water. We urge the EPA to think about long-term
solutions and public infrastructure to address the questions
before us. Water is a gift freely given, how are we to care for
and nurture this gift, not only for ourselves but for our future
generations?
|